윤강로의 스포츠세상 - Rocky YOON's Sport World

[CAS(스포츠중재재판소)에서 세계태권도(WY) 권한에 도전하는 OTU(OTU challenges World Taekwondo authority at CAS)]

​

9월1일자 외신기사내용 정리하여 공유합니다.

​

오세아니아태권도연합(OTU)은 세계태권도연맹(WT)을 상대로 스포츠중재재판소(CAS)에 일련의 법적 소송을 제기했습니다. 이번 법적 도전은 올림픽 스포츠에서 대륙 연합의 자율성과 국제연맹의 기업 거버넌스 권한 범위를 둘러싼 충돌(The Oceania Taekwondo Union has initiated a series of legal actions against the WT at the Court of Arbitration for Sport. This legal challenge is a clash over the boundaries of continental autonomy and corporate governance in Olympic sports)이라고 합니다

[OTU vs World Taekwondo – CAS 법적 분쟁 요약]

1. 사건 배경

오세아니아태권도연합(OTU)이 세계태권도연맹(WT)을 상대로 스포츠중재재판소(CAS)에 법적 소송을 제기했습니다. 핵심 쟁점은 대륙 연합의 자율성과 국제연맹의 권한 범위입니다.

2. 갈등의 시작

-OTU는 2026년 7월 28일 임시총회를 열어 회장 Maher Magableh 를 상업적 사업(commercial retail business: EzyMart) 관련 논란으로 인해 직무 정지시켰습니다. 이는 징계가 아닌 조직의 명예 보호 조치였으나, WT는 이를 인정하지 않고 회의의 합법성 증거를 요구했습니다.

(2025년 9월29일 선출된 OUT 회장 Maher Magableh<호주>)

​

3. 세 가지 주요 항소

1) 임시총회 결과 불인정 문제

-WT가 회장 권한 변경 및 총회 결정을 인정하지 않음 → OTU는 WT가 권한을 넘어섰다고 주장.

-임원 3명(부회장 John Cholai, 사무총장 Linda Pace, 수석부회장 오진근) 직무 정지 (abruptly banning Vice-President John Cholai, Secretary General Linda Pace and Senior Vice-President Oh Jin Keun from communicating or undertaking any official acts on behalf of the regional union)

-WT가 징계 규정을 근거로 임시 제재를 가했으나, OTU는 과도하고 선택적 제재라며 증거 부족을 지적.

2) 행정권 강제 이양 지시

-WT가 Linda Pace 에게 내부 기록·재정·시스템을 WT가 인정한 지도부에 넘기라고 명령 → OTU는 이를 불법적 행정 개입으로 규정.

3) 법적 논점

​

-OTU는 자신들이 호주 빅토리아 법에 따라 설립된 독립 법인임을 강조하며, 국제연맹 규정이 국내법을 임의로 대체할 수 없다고 주장합니다. 이는 조직 주권과 국제연맹 개입 한계를 시험하는 사례입니다.

4) IOC에 문제 제기

-OTU는 IOC에 공식 서한을 보내 WT의 개입이 제도적 자율성과 국제연맹 권한의 경계를 위협한다고 경고했습니다. 또한, 회원국들이 만장일치로 결정한 사항을 WT가 무효화하면 민주적 의사결정이 침해된다고 주장했습니다(The Oceania Taekwondo Union officials has officially brought this dispute to the attention of the International Olympic Committee. They sent a formal letter, detailed in the document to the International Olympic Committee's Associate Director of Institutional and Governance Services. The Oceania Taekwondo Union warned the International Olympic Committee that World Taekwondo's actions raise a significant question concerning institutional autonomy and the proper limits of an international federation's intervention in the internal governance of a continental association).

5) 현재 상황

-분쟁은 단순히 Maher Magableh 회장의 직무 정지 문제를 넘어, WT가 대륙 연합의 내부 거버넌스에 개입할 수 있는지에 대한 국제 스포츠 행정의 권한 충돌로 확대되었습니다.

요약하면, OTU는 CAS를 통해 대륙 연합의 자율성 보장을 요구하며 WT의 개입을 법적으로 다투고 있으며, 이는 국제 스포츠 조직 운영에서 국제연맹 권한과 지역 조직 독립성의 경계를 가르는 중요한 시험대가 되고 있습니다.

[OTU challenges World Taekwondo authority at CAS]

​

The Oceania Taekwondo Union has initiated a series of legal actions against the WT at the Court of Arbitration for Sport. This legal challenge is a clash over the boundaries of continental autonomy and corporate governance in Olympic sports.

Friction between the two bodies intensified following an extraordinary general meeting convened by the regional union online. During the meeting, regional delegates voted unanimously to temporarily suspend Maher Magableh from his duties as president. The extraordinary meeting was organised in response to intense public and media scrutiny of Magableh's commercial retail business, EzyMart.

Regional stakeholders emphasised that this administrative measure was purely intended to protect the continental organisation from reputational risks, rather than being a formal disciplinary penalty.

World Taekwondo refused to recognise the regional assembly's decisions. The global governing body insisted that it had not evaluated the legal implications of the meeting, and refused to recognise any resulting change in executive authority or presidential leadership. World Taekwondo demanded comprehensive documentary proof of the constitutional validity of the meeting's calling and conduct, asserting that international oversight standards must be strictly upheld.

The first appeal relates to World Taekwondo’s refusal to recognise the outcomes of the extraordinary general assembly convened by the regional body on 28 July. Following the meeting, the international governing body made it clear that it would not recognise any subsequent change in presidential authority. Furthermore, the global federation refused to accept any nominations, instructions or administrative decisions based on the assembly's resolutions.

In response, the Oceania Taekwondo Union council members have launched a defence based on jurisdictional overreach. The continental organisation members argue that the global body has exceeded its established powers by attempting to dictate and adjudicate domestic corporate governance. As the regional union is an incorporated association governed by the laws of Victoria, Australia, its leadership asserts that international sporting regulations cannot supersede domestic law at will.

The appeal argues that World Taekwondo lacks the juridical foundation to displace the legal authority of the union's constitutional bodies, setting up a legal test regarding organisational sovereignty.

The second appeal focuses on the preliminary suspensions issued to three high-profile continental executives on an interim basis. The international federation invoked strict provisions of its Disciplinary Actions and Appeals Code, abruptly banning Vice-President John Cholai, Secretary General Linda Pace and Senior Vice-President Oh Jin Keun from communicating or undertaking any official acts on behalf of the regional union.

The appellants are challenging these sanctions, arguing that they are a disproportionate and targeted use of interim powers. They argue that the global body has selectively weaponised exceptional disciplinary measures to systematically disable officeholders associated with a governance stance rejected by the international federation. Furthermore, the legal filing asserts that World Taekwondo utterly failed to provide credible evidence to justify these suspensions on an individual basis. The regional union claims that the international federation could not demonstrate any immediate protective risk that would legally justify the imposition of such consequences on the continent's leadership.

The third and final appeal focuses specifically on the aggressive administrative takeover directives aimed at the Continental Secretary-General, Linda Pace. The international body’s intervention went far beyond merely suspending her international functions. The global federation ordered her to transfer immediate access to all internal records, digital systems, financial accounts and communication channels to the leadership recognised by World Taekwondo.

The appellants have categorised this directive as an impermissible and unlawful intrusion into its domestic administration. By demanding total operational control over the internal systems and private records of an independent, legally incorporated entity, the continental body claims that the global federation has severely overstepped its regulatory boundaries. The appeal asserts that the international body applied punitive, blanket restrictions in order to seize control of the region rather than implementing measured, proportionate preservation measures.

The appeals were filed individually because each WT decision produces distinct legal consequences, even though the cases share the same factual background. The dispute has fundamentally shifted away from the temporary removal of former OTU President Maher Magableh and is now a direct challenge to WT's authority to intervene in continental governance.

According to information obtained by Inside The Games, a video meeting was held with World Taekwondo and all the continental unions. The continental unions criticised WT's actions, particularly those of General Secretary Jeonkang Seo.

The Oceania Taekwondo Union officials has officially brought this dispute to the attention of the International Olympic Committee. They sent a formal letter, detailed in the document to the International Olympic Committee's Associate Director of Institutional and Governance Services. The Oceania Taekwondo Union warned the International Olympic Committee that World Taekwondo's actions raise a significant question concerning institutional autonomy and the proper limits of an international federation's intervention in the internal governance of a continental association.

The regional union emphasised that its 28 July 2026 extraordinary assembly decisions were adopted unanimously by participating Member National Associations, arguing that World Taekwondo’s selective suspensions risk transforming into disciplinary action against officials who were merely implementing the democratic will of the membership.

Highlighting that the international federation itself acknowledged its decisions do not determine effects under national law, the Oceania Taekwondo Union argued that World Taekwondo cannot simultaneously use its sporting recognition powers to practically displace legally constituted continental officeholders.

Consequently, the Oceania Taekwondo Union requested that the International Olympic Committee take note of the situation, encourage constructive dialogue to preserve institutional stability, and consider engaging with World Taekwondo regarding the vital boundary between international regulatory authority and domestic juridical governance.

*References:

-insidethegames

-OUT website

[Askew 선고 후 RADA를 칭찬한 Tygart USADA회장(Tygart praises RADA after Askew sentencing)]

​

9월1일자 외신기사내용 정리하여 공유합니다.

(Travis Tygart USADA 회장)

​

미국도핑방지기구(USADA) 최고경영자는 지난주, 올림픽 단거리 선수에게 테스토스테론을 투여하려 한 음모로 폴 Askew가 징역 6개월을 선고받은 사건을 계기로, 도핑 계획을 겨냥한 연방 법률의 영향력을 강조했다(The US Anti-Doping Agency chief executive last week highlighted the reach of federal legislation targeting doping schemes after Paul Askew was handed a six-month prison term for conspiring to dope an Olympic sprinter with testosterone)고 합니다.

​

[USADA, RADA 법 적용 사례 강조]

1. 사건 개요

-미국도핑방지기구(USADA) CEO Travis Tygart는 올림픽 단거리 선수에게 테스토스테론을 투여하려 한 음모로 Paul Askew(46세, 플로리다 주, Jacksonville)가 징역 6개월을 선고받은 사건을 언급하며, 연방 법률(Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act, RADA/상세 내용 하단부 참조)의 효력을 강조했습니다.

2. 법적 의미

-Tygart는 이번 판결이 “깨끗한 선수들을 위한 중요한 순간”이라며, 도핑 네트워크를 사기 범죄로 취급해 형사 책임을 묻는 접근이 정당성을 입증했다고 평가했습니다. 선수뿐 아니라 금지 약물을 제조·유통·처방·조정하는 자들도 처벌 대상이 되어야 한다고 강조했습니다.

3. 수사 및 예방

-DEA(Drug Enforcement Administration, 미국마약단속국) Orlando 지부, 법무부, 플로리다 연방검찰청과 협력해 Askew와 선수의 계획을 차단했으며, 이는 2024 미국 실내육상선수권, 세계실내육상선수권(Glasgow), 미국 올림픽선발전, Paris2024올림픽에서의 도핑 시도를 막았다고 합니다.

4. 법적 배경

-RADA는 2020년 트럼프 대통령이 서명해 발효된 법으로, 도핑 네트워크 운영자를 대상으로 하며 최대 10년 징역과 25만 달러 벌금형을 규정합니다. 이는 세계도핑방지규약(WADC)의 스포츠 제재를 보완하는 역할을 합니다. 첫 적용 사례는 2024년 2월, 도쿄 올림픽 전 선수들에게 금지약물을 제공한 Eric Lira 가 3개월 형을 선고받은 사건입니다.

5. Askew 사건 세부

1) 기간: 2023년 7월 10일 ~ 2024년 1월 31일

2) 관련 선수: Marvin Bracy-Williams (Rio 2016 출전, 2022 세계선수권 100m 은메달리스트)

3) Bracy는 2023년 여러 대회에서 금지 약물 사용, 이후 내부고발자 (whistleblower)정보로 표적 검사에서 적발됨.

4) 제재: 테스토스테론 사용 및 조사 방해로 21개월, 소재지 보고 실패 3회로 추가 24개월 → 총 45개월 제재.

5) 선수 겸·코치(athlete and coach) Monzavous '”Rae'” Edwards 는 Bracy를 Askew에게 연결한 혐의로 2년 제재.

6) 향후 전망: Tygart는 LA 2028 올림픽 등 미국이 개최할 국제대회에서 RADA가 공정 경쟁과 선수 보호를 강화하는 핵심 도구가 될 것이라고 강조했습니다.

요약하면, 이번 사건은 RADA 법 적용을 통한 도핑 네트워크 처벌의 대표 사례로, 선수뿐 아니라 도핑을 조장·지원하는 인물까지 법적 책임을 묻는 전환점을 보여주었습니다.

[Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act(RADA)에 대하여]

Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act(RADA)는 미국에서 제정된 연방법으로, 국제 도핑 사기 행위에 가담한 사람들을 형사 처벌할 수 있도록 만든 법입니다. 선수 개인이 아닌 도핑 네트워크 운영자·공급자·조정자 등을 대상으로 하며, 최대 10년 징역과 25만 달러 벌금형을 규정합니다.

​

A. 주요 내용 정리

1) 제정 배경

-2019년 미국 의회에서 통과, 2020년 12월 4일 트럼프 대통령 서명으로 발효.

-러시아 도핑 스캔들을 폭로한 Gregory Rodchenkov 박사의 이름을 따서 명명

2) 적용 대상

-선수 개인은 제외: 이미 세계도핑방지규약(WADC)에 따라 스포츠 제재를 받음.

-대신 도핑 네트워크 운영자, 공급자, 제조자, 처방자, 조정자 등 선수에게 금지 약물을 제공하거나 도핑을 기획·실행하는 사람들을 형사 처벌.

3) 적용 범위

(1)국제 대회: 미국 선수와 다른 나라 선수들이 함께 참가하는 국제 경기.

(2)방송권·후원 등 미국 내 상업적 연결이 있는 경우 적용.

(3)역외 적용 가능: 해외에서 발생한 도핑 사기라도 미국과 연결되면 처벌 가능.

​

4) 형량 및 벌금

(1)최대 10년 징역형.

(2)최대 $25만 달러(약 2억 8천만 원) 벌금.

​

5) 사례

​

-Eric Lira 사건(2024년 2월): 도쿄 올림픽 전 선수들에게 금지 약물 제공 → RADA 최초 적용, 3개월 징역형.

-Paul Askew 사건(2024년): 미국 단거리 선수에게 테스토스테론 제공 음모 → 6개월 징역형.

​

6) 의미와 영향

(1) 스포츠 청렴성 강화: 도핑을 단순한 스포츠 규칙 위반이 아닌 사기 범죄로 규정.

(2) 선수 보호: 깨끗한 선수들의 권익과 공정 경쟁 보장.

(3) 국제적 파급력: 미국이 개최하는 LA 2028 올림픽 등 대형 이벤트에서 도핑 네트워크 억제에 중요한 역할.

​

정리하면, RADA는 도핑 네트워크를 형사 범죄로 처벌하는 세계 최초의 법적 장치로, 선수 개인이 아닌 도핑을 기획·지원하는 세력을 겨냥해 국제 스포츠의 공정성과 신뢰를 강화하는 데 목적이 있다고 합니다.

[Tygart praises RADA after Askew sentencing]

​

​

The US Anti-Doping Agency chief executive last week highlighted the reach of federal legislation targeting doping schemes after Paul Askew was handed a six-month prison term for conspiring to dope an Olympic sprinter with testosterone.

In Travis T. Tygart's view, the significance of the case extends beyond a single conviction, as the outcome "marks an important moment for clean athletes" and confirms the value of "treating doping schemes as the serious fraud that they are under the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act", an approach that allows those involved in such networks to be held criminally accountable.

Building on that assessment, Tygart stressed that holding competitors accountable under anti-doping rules must not allow those who enable the fraud to escape punishment, and said that "those who manufacture, distribute, prescribe, or coordinate the use of prohibited drugs must also face consequences" for harming clean athletes and undermining public trust in sport.

Tygart also thanked the Drug Enforcement Administration's Orlando District Office, the Department of Justice and the US Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida for working together to bring the scheme to a halt before it could cause further harm to clean athletes, fans and the integrity of sport.

According to USADA, the intervention prevented Askew and the sprinter from acting on their intention to use illegal testosterone injections to improve the athlete's performance at the 2024 American Indoor Track and Field Championships, the World Athletics Indoor Championships in Glasgow, the US Olympic Trials and the Paris 2024 Olympic Games.

Looking to the years ahead, Tygart also expressed his gratitude to the administration of then US President Donald Trump for signing RADA into law in 2020 after Congress passed it with unanimous bipartisan support. With the United States preparing to host further major international events, including the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games, he said the legislation would allow USADA and the federal government to "protect clean athletes and fair competition here and beyond".

USADA regards the legislation as a complement to the World Anti-Doping Code, which already provides for sporting sanctions against athletes, while RADA expressly excludes individual athletes from this federal offence and instead targets those who carry out, attempt to carry out or conspire to operate such schemes. It has extraterritorial reach and carries maximum penalties of 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 (€215,000) for individuals.

The law had already set a precedent in the case of Texan Eric Lira, who presented himself as a kinesiologist and naturopathic doctor and was the first person charged and convicted under RADA, receiving three months in prison in February 2024 for providing banned substances to athletes before Tokyo 2020.

Against that backdrop, Askew, 46, of Jacksonville, Florida, pleaded guilty on 26 May to conspiring to influence major international sporting competitions through doping, following a joint investigation by USADA and the DEA. He will serve the federal term after completing a state sentence on separate fraud-related charges.

The scheme ran from approximately 10 July 2023 to 31 January 2024 and involved Marvin Bracy-Williams, whom USADA identified as the athlete to whom Askew supplied testosterone. The US sprinter, who competed at Rio 2016 and won world 100m silver in 2022, used the powerful banned anabolic steroid while competing at the Ed Murphey Classic, the Xiamen Diamond League and the Prefontaine Classic in 2023, according to court documents.

The case came to light in early 2024 after information from a whistleblower prompted USADA to conduct a targeted out-of-competition test that returned a positive result for an anabolic agent. Bracy-Williams initially attempted to tamper with the investigation but later admitted the violations and provided substantial assistance, reducing his sanction for testosterone use and tampering to 21 months; a further 24 months were added for three whereabouts failures, bringing the total to 45.

Meanwhile, athlete and coach Monzavous 'Rae' Edwards received a two-year suspension for introducing Bracy-Williams to Askew so that the sprinter could obtain testosterone.

*References:

-insidethegames

-USADA website

[UEFA(유럽축구협회), Infantino 폭로 위해 미국 법원으로(UEFA resorts to US courts to expose Infantino)]

​

​

8월28일자 외신기사내용 정리하여 공유합니다.

​

​

이번 법적 공세는 Infantion와 그의 반대자들 간의 전투에서 교전의 양상을 새롭게 그려냈습니다. 단순한 말싸움은 훨씬 더 심각한 것으로 바뀌었고, 이는 결국 스위스 출신 행정가가 재판에 직면할 수도 있는 사법적 충돌로 이어질 수 있다(This legal offensive has redrawn the lines of engagement in the battle between Infantino and his opponents. Verbal sparring has given way to something far more serious: a judicial clash that could ultimately see the Swiss administrator face trial.)고 합니다.

​

[외신기사요약]

1. 법적 공세 시작

- UEFA가 FIFA 회장 Gianni Infantino를 상대로 미국 법원에 소송을 제기했습니다. 단순한 말싸움 수준을 넘어, 스위스 형법 158조(배임·관리 부실)에 근거한 형사 고발로 이어질 수 있는 사안입니다.

2. 국제적 연대

UEFA는 아시아축구연맹(AFC)과 북중미카리브축구연맹(Concacaf)의 정치적 지지를 확보했으며, 뉴욕과 플로리다 연방 법원에 ‘Section 1782’ 신청을 통해 Thrive Capital, JP Morgan, FIFA 미국 법인의 관련 문서 제출을 요구했습니다

3. 논란의 핵심– FIFA Forward Enterprise

-Infantino가 추진한 FIFA Forward Enterprise 프로젝트는 월드컵 상업권의 20%를 민간 투자자에게 매각하려는 계획이었습니다. Thrive Capital은 $ 42억 달러를 제시했지만, UEFA는 이를 “시장 가치와 동떨어진 사기성 가격”이라 주장했습니다.

4. 내부 반발

-미국축구협회 전 회장 Carlos Cordeiro 가 돌연 사임하며, 해당 거래를 “축구와 FIFA 회원국에 끔찍한 거래”라고 규정한 편지가 UEFA 법원 제출 문서에 포함되었습니다.

5. Infantino의 방어

-사우디아라비아축구협회가 즉각적으로 그의 리더십을 지지하며 ‘단결’을 촉구했고, 아프리카(CAF)와 남미(CONMEBOL)라는 두 대규모 투표 블록의 지지도 여전히 확보한 상태입니다. 이는 2027년 FIFA 회장 선거를 앞둔 그의 정치적 기반을 강화합니다.

요약하면, UEFA는 Infantino의 월드컵 상업권 민간 매각 시도를 배임·사기성 거래로 규정하며 미국 법원에 소송을 제기했고, 이는 FIFA 내부와 외부에서 큰 파장을 일으키고 있습니다. 그러나 Infantino는 여전히 주요 대륙 연맹의 지지를 확보하고 있어, 법적·정치적 공방이 장기화될 가능성이 큽니다

​

​

[UEFA resorts to US courts to expose Infantino]

This legal offensive has redrawn the lines of engagement in the battle between Infantino and his opponents. Verbal sparring has given way to something far more serious: a judicial clash that could ultimately see the Swiss administrator face trial.

Another day, another controversy in the football ecosystem. There is no calm. Nor is there a lull. The lifting of the boycott in Monaco on Thursday, during UEFA's Congress and the Champions League draw, was, in fact, the first step towards taking legal action. UEFA then decided to strike in the courts using heavy international artillery, formally preparing a criminal complaint in the very country of the accused, Infantino, for alleged 'criminal breach of trust,' as revealed by ESPN, which had access to the 60-page document that was submitted to FIFA at its North American headquarters in Coral Gables (Florida), as well as to Thrive and JP Morgan in New York.

Yesterday the topic was a Civil War, whereas today matters have already escalated. UEFA's legal advisers have built their case around Article 158 of the Swiss Criminal Code, which concerns criminal mismanagement, accusing Infantino and his inner circle of devising a clandestine scheme for their own financial and political benefit while damaging the assets of the institution, and, by extension, the interests of the wider football family.

UEFA is not acting alone in the courts. It enjoys firm political backing from the Asian Football Confederation and Concacaf, representing North America, Central America and the Caribbean, both of which also believe they were misled. In the past few hours, UEFA has therefore filed a formal application under 'Section 1782' before a federal court in Manhattan and another in Florida, seeking to compel Thrive Capital Management, the New York investment fund led by Joshua Kushner, JP Morgan and FIFA's US subsidiaries to hand over immediately all written communications and confidential contracts connected with the proposed transaction.

At the centre of the dispute lies the controversial FIFA Forward Enterprise project, an attempt to privatise part of the World Cup's commercial operation that ultimately collapsed in spectacular fashion. UEFA's legal dossier, running to roughly 60 pages, alleges that the $4.2 billion (€3.57bn) Thrive Capital was prepared to pay for a 20% stake in the World Cup's commercial arm represented a "fraudulent price entirely detached from market value".

FIFA Forward Enterprise was a confidential project conceived under Infantino to privatise 20% of FIFA's commercial business. The intention was to sell one fifth of the exploitation rights attached to FIFA competitions, including the highly lucrative men's and women's World Cups, to a consortium of private investors led by New York-based Thrive Capital, headed by Joshua Kushner, with JP Morgan advising on the transaction.

The proposed operation carried a valuation of no less than $20bn (€17.1bn). When details of the plan emerged only weeks ago, UEFA, Concacaf and the AFC regarded it as a betrayal, as well as an attempt by Infantino to entrench himself in power by placing an enormous pool of private capital beyond the organisation's ordinary democratic oversight.

UEFA, under Aleksander Čeferin, maintains that Infantino attempted to sell football's commercial patrimony at a discount and behind the back of FIFA's own Council. According to Al Jazeera, the federation describes the Swiss president's conduct as "an act of coercion unworthy of an institution entrusted with protecting football", while alleging that FIFA operates "through intimidation and without internal restraints".

The court documents disclosed in recent weeks contain another potentially damaging blow to FIFA's position: the resignation letter of Carlos Cordeiro.

Cordeiro, the former President of US Soccer and, until only weeks ago, one of Infantino's closest senior advisers on global strategy, resigned abruptly. His letter, quoted directly by UEFA in its court filings, describes the proposed World Cup deal as "a terrible deal for FIFA's member associations, a terrible deal for football and a terrible deal for the long-term future of the game".

For all the controversies that have accumulated around him, however, Infantino is far from defenceless. In the immediate aftermath of the legal scandal, the Saudi Arabian Football Federation issued an urgent official release publicly backing his leadership and calling for the restoration of 'unity'. For the time being, the Swiss administrator also retains the support of the two largest voting blocs in Africa, through CAF, and South America, through Conmebol, ahead of the FIFA presidential election scheduled for March 2027.

*References;

-insidethegames

-WSJ

-EUFA website